Audit Reports

Table-4.1: Year-wise quantity and price of imported vis-à-vis domestic coal Year Target given for import Quantity awarded Actual coal import Average landed cost of imported coal per tonne at stations (in `)* Average landed cost of domestic coal per tonne at stations (in `)* Difference in price..................

Second set of in-motion weigh bridge was commis sioned only in July 2015. Management stated (April 2016) that a lot of effort s were taken up at Vindhyachal station to stabilize the weigh bridge operation at the station end which included various modifications in the weigh bridge in..................

4299.80 Report No.35 of 2016 37 Audit observed that while the stations suffered gen eration loss due to coal shortage on the one hand, they paid performance incentive to coal c ompanies for excess supply of coal beyond ACQ on the other. Audit also noticed that th e FSA allowed transfer of..................

Fortnightly Progress for Irrigation 3. Administration of Master Data for Irrigation Scheme s 4. Financial and Physical performance monitoring of Irrigation Schemes 5. Water Supply Schemes Management 6. Monthly Water Supply to Habitations Chief Minister Office 1. Physical file Tracking..................

However, DTs were not repaired by the suppl ier (October 2015).  In Uttar Pradesh , several incidents of poor performance of CCB Serv er had been reported in October 2014, January 2015 and February 2015. By March 2015, the problem had escalated but no Root Cause Analysis (R CA) 10 was done..................

Since IP-1 registra tion did not carry the load of entry fee and bank guarantee whereas IP-II licensee had to de posit a Performance Bank Guarantee of ` 100 crore in addition to annual license fee in the form of revenue share @ 6 per cent of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) 8, STL was causing..................

Report \bo. 28 o\f 2016 (Per\formance Audit) 45 Chapter\b4\b C\fntr\fl\bMechanism\b \b 4.1\b Intr\fducti\fn\b\b \b Intern\fl control covers \fll \fctivities inclu\bing pl \fns, policies, mo\bus oper\fn\bi, \fttitu\bes \fn\b efforts of the employees...

We conducted performance audit of the Income Tax De partment (ITD) with the objectives of verifying whether (a) the deduction under section 80IA has been allow ed by the ITD only to the eligible assessees/businesses in compliance with th e provision of the Act/Rules/Circulars /Instructions;..................

Report \bo. 28 o\f 2016 (Per\formance Audit) 29 Chapter\b3\b:\bMistake\bin\bassessments\b \b 3.1\b Intr\fducti\fn\b\b Compli\fnce to provisions of the Act both by the \fss essee \fn\b the AOs is essenti\fl \fn\b hence highlighting \bevi\ftions to...

Ltd. AABCI7740M 2010-11 2011-12 CIT-1,Pune 433.59 6 Maharashtra India Land Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. AABCI3428 2012-13 CIT-1,Pune 168.39 7 Maharashtra Sai Construction Pvt. Ltd. AAECS6091E 2010-11 CIT CC, Pune 81.58 8 Maharashtra Kolte Patil Developers Ltd AAACK7310G 2010-11 CIT..................

Audit forwarded 36 draft paragraphs and one Performance A udit (PA) to the Principal Secretaries / Secretaries of the respective Departments by name between May and October 201 5. The Principal Secretaries / Secretaries of the Departments did not send replies to 24 draft paragraphs..................

Table 6.1 (` in crore) Sl. No. Categories Number of cases Amount 1. Performance Audit (PA) of “Impl ementation of the Integrated Mines and Minerals Management System (i3MS)” 1 658.77 2. Non / short receipt of Government revenue under Government account 91 298.05 3. Other irregularities 40..................

Motor Vehicles Taxation ORR Off -Road Register OSBC Odisha State Beverage Corporation Limited OS T Odisha Sales Tax OVAT Odisha Value Added Tax PA Performance Audit PAC Public Accounts Committee PAG Principal Accountant General PDF Portable Document Format L M N O P Audit Report (Revenue..................