Audit Reports

Incentives To Milk Producers 1,01,33,244 11,98,97,04,847 97,88,078 11,64,44,86,043 49,419 6,33,76,821 1,21,452 10,92,11,875 1,74,295 17,26,30,108 2 5 Pre-metric Scholarship for OBC 24,64,503 2,07,12,39,500 23,49,195 1,96,68,74,750 4,127 34,72,950 17,069 1,40,41,100 94,112 8,68,50,700 3 6...............

10 GoK: order AHF 53 – 2008 KMF Bangalore dated 08.09.2008 11 Solid Not Fat Chapter 3 Implementation of DBT in selected schemes Chapter 3 Implementation of DBT in selected schemes 20 Table 3.1: Status of release and utilisation of funds (` in crore) Year Amount released Expenditure incurred...............

Audit scope and methodology 4 1.2.4 Acknowledgement 4 Chapter II Implementation and Management of DBT 2.1 Status of onboarding of identified schemes 5 2.2 Efficiency of implementation of DBT 6 2.2.1 Successful transactions 6 2.2.2 Failed transactions 10 2.2.3 Pending transactions 11 2.2.4...............

167931.87 (69) 187436.37 (67) 188947.57 (67) 164254.98 (61) Taxes on Agricultural Income - - - - - - - - 0.02 ( 0) State Goods and Service Tax - - 50063.00 (30) 82352.32 (44) 82601.59 (44) 69948.56 (43) Taxes on Sales, Trade, etc. 81174.17 (60) 54893.51 (33) 35724.61 (19) 37785.54 (20) 33159.76...............

Report of the receipts and expenditure incurred out of MNN were not submitted (October 202 1) to the State Legislature, despite the fact that ₹ 5,834.74 crore was spent from this fund till March 2020. 1 Paragraph 1.2.3, Paragraph 1.5.2, Paragraph 1.2.3 and Paragraph 4.1.1 of the Report of...............

Allocation for Central Schemes and corresponding State Share in those schemes 4. Allocation for State’s flagship schemes/ programmes 5. Once the sectoral allocation is finalised, Administrative Departments submit the estimates to Finance Department 6. Demands for Grants are placed in Budget...............

to the National GDP (₹ in crore) Year 2016-17 2017-18 +++ 2018-19 ++ 2019-20 + 2020-21 $ GDP (2011-12 series) 15391669 17090042 18886957 203 51013 19745670 Growth rate of GDP (in per cent ) 11.76 11.03 10.51 7.75 (-)2.97 State’s GSDP (2011-12 series) 2198185 2352782 2579628 2818555...............

in test-che cked ULBs Coverage of water supply connection ( per cent) Number of ULBs 100 per cent 7 More than 75 but less than 100 20 More than 50 but less than 75 15 More than 25 but less than 50 0 Less than 25 0 Source: Information furnished by ULBs
Out of 42 test-checked ULBs, only...............

to the provisions of the Cons titution (Seventy-fourth) Amendment Act Chapter 4: Empowerment of Urban Local Bodies and th eir functioning Chapter 5: Financial resources of Urban Local Bodie s Chapter 6: Human resources in Urban Local Bodies Chapter 7: Effectiveness of delivery of water suppl...............

2.1.1 Implementing agency The Gram Panchayat is the single most important age ncy for executing works. The Act mandated earmarking a minimum of 50 per cent of the works to be executed by the Gram Panchayat and upto hundred per cent of the works may be allotted to the Gram Panchayat (GP) in the...............

Block Development Committee; \J \J \J 3 ‘Activity Mapping ‘is an exercise to devolve various functions to be discharged by the GPs and ZPs. 5 Village Health & Sanitation Committee; District Technical Support Committee; Water Supply & Sanitation Committee for smooth functionin g of the...............

The coverage was re duced from 100 to 75, extent of segregation from 80 to 55, extent of recovery from 75 to 65 and cost recovery from 80 to 60 per cent. This indicated that benchmark announced in Septembe r 2013 was neither based on sound rationale nor adequate steps were ta ken by GMC to...............

95 CHAPTER - V AUDIT ON TRANSACTIONS OF URBAN LOCAL BODIES 5.1 Non completion of project within stipulated time led to loss of second instalment amounting to ` `` ` 1.25 crore Implementation of challenge...............

a close supervision on progress of work led to reframing of estimate, reduction of length of Suspension Foot Bridge (SFB) and extra expenditure of ` 55.19 lakh on account of higher tender premium ( `10.90 lakh), cost escalation in civil work ( ` 37.20 lakh) and stock material ( ` 7.09 lakh)................

AUDIT ON TRANSACTIONS OF PANCHAYATI RAJ INSTITUTIONS 3.1 Excess expenditure on construction of Suspension Foot Bridge to the tune of ` ` ` ` 55.19 lakh Failure of the ZP (South) to initiate the work expe ditiously and failure to keep a close supervision on progress of work led to...............

conservation, rural health, forest \P \P \P 3 ‘Activity Mapping ‘is an exercise to devolve various functions to be discharged by the GPs and ZPs. 5 related activities for forest conservation, self-employment through small scale industries etc. mandated in the 73 rd Constitutional Amendment................

Total number of 7 Inspection Reports (IRs) and 53 paras w ere issued to ULBs during the period 2013-16, of which 2 IRs and 26 paras were settled, leaving 5 IRs and 27 paras having a money value of ` 27.33 lakh outstanding as of September 2016 for wa nt of corrective action/reply on the part...............

In lakh 6.11 12,101.93 PRIs Numbers 180 2,46,062 Municipal Corporation Numbers 1 139 Municipal Council Numbers 1 1,595 Nagar Panchayat Numbers 5 2,108 Gender Ratio 1000 male 890 940 Poverty Per cent 19.33 26.10 Literacy Per cent 81.42 74.04 Total Households Numbers 1,29,006 19,35,79,954...............

The work was completed in January 2015 at a cost of ` 121.15 lakh after recording a delay of 50 months. Scrutiny of records revealed (February 2016) that e xecution of work was characteris ed by extra expenditure on account of acceptance of higher tender premium ( ` 7.20 lakh); allowing self...............

In lakh 6.11 12,101.93 PRIs Numbers 180 2,46,062 Municipal Corporation Numbers 1 139 Municipal Council Numbers 1 1,595 Nagar Panchayat Numbers 5 2,108 Gender Ratio 1000 male 890 940 Poverty Per cent 19.33 26.10 Literacy Per cent 81.42 74.04 Total Households Numbers 1,29,006 19,35,79,954...............

The category-wise ULBs in the State as of March 201 5 are shown in table 3.1: Table - 3.1 Category-wise ULBs in Sikkim Sl. No. ULBs Number of ULBs 1 Municipal Corporation 1 2 Municipal Council 1 3 Nagar Panchayats 5 Total 7 The ULBs are governed by the Sikkim Municipalities Act, 2007................