Page 24 of 99, showing 10 records out of 988 total
contract 2.18 As per clause c ontained in the “Instructions to the tenderers”, if the quantity of the equipment ordered remains unsupplied within scheduled delivery period and upto to the finalisation of the new tender and price of the equipment falls in new tender, then the contractor will...........................
State Road Transpor t Corporation 2012 -13 12 February 2016 2013 -14 2014 -15 2 September 2015 24 March 2017 2 Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation 2011 -12 19 November 2014 2012 -13 12 November 2015 3 Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation 2015 -16 14 February 2019 2016 -17 20 November 2018 4 Uttar...........................
Budget Provision Expenditure 1 Labour and Employment 57.36 58.38 2 Information and Publicity 21.39 20.11 3 Tribal Affairs and Hill and Schedule Caste 704.77 662.82 4 Adult Education* 1,466.58 1,263.75 5 Education (Schools)* 6 Education (University)* 7 Technical Education* 8 Medical Health...........................
4,629.47 97.97 (15.12 ) - 82.85 7.64 4,712.32 5,072.34 360.02 118.96 2010 -11 5,072.34 703.76 (15.12 ) - 688.64 7.56 5,760.98 6,196.51 435.53 296.75 2011 -12 6,196.51 518.20 (15.12 ) - 503.08 7.63 6,699.59 7,210.77 511.18 338.21 2012 -13 7,210.77 1,056.25 (15.12 ) - 1,041.13 7.66 8,251.90...........................
4 of 2019 56 this lan d to Allottee ‘M’ , the land was handed back (December 2011) to Revenue Department. The Corporation requested (December 2011 to February 2013) the Collector, Ahmedabad to return the interim payment. The Corporation followed up the matter only from April 2018. Audit...........................
The Project with estimated cost of ` 676.29 crore was scheduled to be completed by March 2015, but the same was commissio ned after a delay of 29 months in September 2017 at a cost of ` 1,319.33 crore. As a result, the generation cost had increased from ` 3.74 to ` 6.23 per unit...........................
1,124.31 94.63 -33.88 2009 -10 1,124.31 117.16 - 1,241.47 8.59 1,348.11 106.64 -55.92 2010 -11 1,348.11 34.61 - 1,382.72 7.78 1,490.29 107.5 8 -38.15 2011 -12 1,490.29 26.94 9.50 1,526.73 7.80 1,645.82 119.09 -72.06 2012 -13 1,645.82 45.76 5.00 1,696.58 8.08 1,833.66 137.08 -88.46 2013 -14...........................
Under the provisions of BTEG Act, 1993 adjustment of entry tax paid by a dealer on purchase of scheduled goods 34 towards his VAT liability is not admissible in various circumstances such as (i) the goods imported were not re-sold, (ii) the rate of VAT was less than the rate of ET, and (iii)...........................
for providing drinking water to two water deficit zones of Sardarshahar town namely Zone 5 and 6 inhabited predominantly by persons belonging to scheduled caste/scheduled tribe community . The TSs included the work of construction of two new Over Head Service Reservoirs ( OHSRs) one for each...........................
Clause 3 (9) of TPDS (Control) Order, 2015 envisaged that the State Government shall use the list of persons as compiled during Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC) 6 or any other authentic source of data to cross check and verify the list of eligible households and their members. 3 Ajmer, Alwar,...........................
ls (FICs) were also not fully completed in any of the six test - checked projects even after a lapse of two to eighteen years, after their original scheduled dates of completion as there were lapses in planning and execution of the works in synchronisation w ith the Irrigation Potential already...........................
lekfo’V p fpZysys ifjPNsn d kefxjh ys[kkijh{kk i fjPNsn d kefxjh ys[kkijh{kk i fjPNsn 2008&09 - 4 - 4 2009&10 1 5 1 5 2010&11 1 1 - 1 2011&12 1 3 - 3 2012&13 2 10 - 3 2013&14 - 4 - 4 2014&15 2 3 - 1 2015&16 - 5 - - 2016&17 1 6 - - , dw.k 8 41 1 21 ¼LL =ksr% lkoZtfud miØe...........................
- 2.00 5,632.00 - 2006-07 - - - - - - - - - 2007-08 - - - - - - - - - 2008-09 - - - - - - - - - 2009-10 - - - - - - - - - 2010-11 - - - - - - - - - 2011-12 - - - - - - - - - 2012-13 - - - - - - - - - 2013-14 - - - 2,502.72 - - 2,502.72 - - 2014-15 - - - 5,880.58 - - 5,880.58 - - 2015-16 - - -...........................
82,158.95 7,454.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,454.87 7.40 89,613.82 96,245.24 2010-11 96,245.24 8,328.12 0.00 0.68 0.00 8,327.44 7.40 1,04,572.68 1,12,311.06 2011-12 1,12,311.06 8,110.91 200.00 0.05 0.00 8,310.86 7.50 1,20,621.92 1,29,668.56 2012-13 1,29,668.56 7,767.94 179.02 0.01 0.00 7,946.95 7.40...........................
16 th Report of 2015-16 2010-11 14 12 26 th Report of 2015-16 Standalone Report on “Government Land given on lease” 19 13 33 rd Report of 2017-18 2011-12 17 14 37 th Report of 2017-18 2012-13 44 Total 300 The Department-wise and Audit Report-wise breakup o f the 300 awaited ATNs are given in...........................
We noticed in 17 cases that the dealers had paid ta xes along with returns for various periods from 2007-08 to 2011-12 with delays ranging from one to 98 months. However, the concerned assessing office rs either did not levy the interest or levied it short. The non/short levy of interest worked...........................
91.81 2009-10 1,162 2,235 91.81 93 285 23.90 116 136 7.22 1,139 2,384 108.49 2010-11 1,139 2,384 108.49 155 764 55.05 40 202 56.28 1,254 2,946 107.26 2011-12 1,254 2,946 107.26 81 565 66.08 32 185 3.92 1,303 3,326 169.42 2012-13 1,303 3,326 169.42 103 473 23.13 191 453 11.49 1,215 3,346 181.06...........................
As per prescribed time line, the assessments for the year 2011 -12 were to be completed by November 2018 24. How ever, out of 26 AETCs, the 4,288 assessments for the year 2011 -12 in 5 AE TCs offices were pending as on 28 February 2019 (detailed below). Table 2.9: Arrears of Assessment Total...........................