Page 40 of 49, showing 10 records out of 483 total
purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the functioning of PRIs and ULBs in the State and draw the attention of the concerned Executive Departments to take appropriate remedial action wherever necessary. Overview vii OVERVIEW This Report, dealing with the results of audit of accounts............
49 2.5 Statement showing non submission of utilisation certificates by the line departments during 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12. 50 4.1 Statement showing un-adjusted advances lying with various Implementing Officers/Agencies of Udaipur Nagar Panchayat as on 31-03-2012. 51 4.2 Non............
JMC, three MCs and 39 MBs 1978-2003 268.45 Annexure-XIX (2) Tehbazari 22 MCK, MC Pali and five MBs 1985-2003 115.93 Annexure-XX (3) Amount of contracts for collection of hides, skins and bones of dead animals MC Beawar and 19 MBs 1968-2003 10.96 Annexure-XXI (4) Cost of lands allotted/sold MB,............
Guarantees Codal provisions stipulate that Bank Guarantees (BG) should be obtained from the contractors as a valid security towards performance of contracts. These had to be renewed on expiry and encashed in case of any default on the part of the contractor. Audit scrutiny in the test-checked............
arising out of audit of (i) State finance, (ii) Statutory Corporations, Boards and Government Companies, (iii) Revenue Receipts and (iv) Civil Departments are presented separately. 5. The cases mentioned in the Report are among those which came to notice in the course of test audit of............
of accounts, parking of scheme funds in fixed deposits, non-conducting of physical verification of stores and stock and non-reconciliation of departmental figures with treasury. [Paragraph 1] 2. Functioning of Anantapur Municipal Corporation in Sanitation, Water supply, Property tax,............
Staff in ZP Patna `42.30 Lakh 5.3 23 iii List of Appendices Appendices Particulars Page Number Appendix -I Details of Functions Devolved by 20 Departments to PRIs 27 Appendix -II Details of Surcharge Notice Issued during 2010-11 28 Appendix -III Non-Realisation of Revenue 29 Appendix -IV............
at source: EA f ailed to deduct VAT at source of ` 3.64 crore as per section 34(1) of VAT Act though it made a payment of ` 90.94 crore towards work contracts. This omissio n at tract s liabilit y for payment of penalty of twice the TDS not deducted under section 34(8) of VAT Act. EA stated............
We observed that there was no system in the Company to procure cement on the basis of Rate Contracts. As a result, the rates of procurement of cement were on higher side when co mpared with the procurement rates of cement of UPRNN during the same period. Mention was made vide Para no. 3.3............